No Paradox

When we view our heavens it is true that we are stuck to earth by gravity.

I use the word heavens since universe is a synonym for the same principal.

Note please that political correctness is a matter for interpreters to translate.



Ignore = Meaning as per the following commonly used senses.

{1}Access denied "We will ignore his/her/your request."

{2} Take no note of "We/I will ignore what you/they say."

{3} To Separate " I/We ignore them." or "(Insert name) ignores you/(insert others name).

{4} Will not remember "I will put YOU/(INSERT NAME) on my/our ignore list.

{5} Disassociate "Party of the first part will in future ignore that/those apostate/s."



Ignore = VERB which thus is the action that denies accessibility in a relationship which leaves both parties in a state of ignorance its NOUN.



Ignore then is not a kind nor friendly word yet in the other sense of kind it is a kind of a word. In fact it is a definition for enmity as I look at all the people in the ghettos and slums of this earth who have been ignored by their state leaders.



Then to follow on logically to that which can be known about ignore is all of the people who are caught in its vicious circle. When one ignores the law of gravitas one jumps off that plane without a parachute. Now only a suicide victim would choose that path. So there is a thing called a decision tree that articulates all of the outcomes from each and every course of action that leads to, on one hand destructive consequences and on the other creative consequences. I think that some members of the earths population have been ignoring the wrong people/groups/ideas. Why they change a word to re-identify it like universe for heavens is because when they use the old word that has attached to it the stigma of religiosity it means they would have to have a heavenlyversity not a university, so no longer is it ambiguous it is no longer a paradox. We are enabled to be able to get out from those kinds of vicious circle of which there are many not yet identified.



P=EAT



P.S. MD is now ignorant of this fact and therefore has put himself at a sever disadvantage to other's who do read this and understand its meaning. This will put MD at a distinct disadvantage for choosing to put me or anyone on IGNORE. Same for everybody else who IGNORED GOD'S WORD THE BIBLE. The only extant record of those most ancient of events historically that one can ever put trust IN. Ignore implies exclusion which means you are not in the party of survivors into the NEW HEAVENS and EARTH where the one objective is to turn it into a paradisaic garden. Only a fool would not wish/pray/desire/think/believe/have faith to be in that.

On Sense Abilities

[QUOTE=Antone;466858]
If all consciousness is subjective, how can we ever be conscious of anything other than ourselves? [/QUOTE]

 To speak a word is to be conscious that one can either fool oneself or fool others and teach self or in so doing: teach others. Thus the subject of consciousness is for to not be deceived so easily in the face of, the evil ones temptations, as one lies on that torturers bed of nails in ones trials and tribulations over the fetching of food and water from earth and well.


When that state is in itself, as corrupted, as the pigs, as in Orwell's "Animal Farm". (Went to see David Leans "Doctor Zhivago' during the week, noted the English accent seemed out of place and was not fooled for a second by the facade of a love story) Political expediency means to obey the laws of your land and that the makers of those rules can change them at their whim and fancy so that the outcome so generated fills their houses with stuff that will end up on a rubbish tip. When the fact remains that not one thing ever raised was not done so via an act of will on the part of the willing. Milk and eggs do not grow on supermarket shelves.



Consciousness is one of those pesky four syllable words borrowed from the Romans/Greeks. A word that is a sentence in itself, that is a label or noun that stands in the place of all that was ever thought about from the stroke of genius that was felt from first to last words over what it means to be alive as opposed to what it means to be dead. Milk comes from cows who eat grass and eggs come from chickens who eat seeds of grasses and scraps. They crap and we crap and the stuff becomes compost and is the food for the next crop. That is what I am conscious of in the map of earths territories bounded by the waters of all rivers seas, clouds and airs: graces and disgraces.



[QUOTE=ANTONE]First, is it logical to conclude that all consciousness is subjective? If it is not, then what else is it? And how does it work? [/QUOTE]



Pain and Pleasure are complementary pairs just as Malevolence and Benevolence are. Logic is the thing as it is known to behave or act as it is actor on the stage as archetype or anti-type. The question of the metaphysicains is invalidated by "We are what we do and have done and will do" Who are we, where do we come from and where are we going to are the realms ruled by the philosophical metaphysicains who forgot to ask their creator what the soul is. I walk on the sole of my foot composed of a thesis and an arsis. That is the footfall and they are the steps taken in formulating each and ever algorithimical process. Reciprocation is the key to a proper theory of numbers. a/bxb/a=1 everytime I look at any pair in the set of natural integers. Anybody with the simplest of calculator/spreadsheets can prove it in as little as four calculations. Whether it works for the complex numbers is yet to be realized. For a theory to be true it must undergo rigorous testing is the answer. When proved true it was always true and is therefore an eduction as opposed to a deduction and induction. Rather like walking a tightrope is it not? Take care do not fall off, Houdini never ever reported back to his wife, so I was informed anecdotally which are but merely fragments of evidence as left behind repeated like Chinese whispers concerning the origins of fossilized bones.



[QUOTE=ANT ONE]Second, If it is subjective (as Descartes suggested) does this have any practical affect on how we should see the world? And [/QUOTE]

Subject from my viewpoint is an object to devote ones attentions too, to gain a wholistic perspective.



[QUOTE= ANT ONE]Third, is it possible to work our way back towards giving 'reality' meaning? And, if so, how do we do that?[/QUOTE]





Within the boundaries of information theory from one extreme to the other the subject from Turing machine to the automaton. I do not claim to know how they work. I do know that from clay we were made and that we speak what is thought after that which was felt was felt and looking little more aware than an ancient jewish golum. Whether it was six cuts across the hand for playing up by throwing paper planes in religious instruction class in 1966 or it was following the crowd to-wards evil ends the fact remains that pain and suffering for the consequences of ones actions is de rogue and that R.I. Teacher Preachers should refer to the GOLDEN RULE before they lash out at you. Shame on them for not practicing what they preach. Thanks MD and ANT ONE you have been helpful. We do it via logic, grammar and rhetoric if we fail those subjects in the scholastics enterprising trivium how in the rubbish tip can anyone ever understand arithmetic, let alone geometry, let alone astronomy, let alone the wonderful art of music, then appears to be, in it's dding, not so trivial anymore.



P=EAT

Ever Notice

We the men of earth do respect the fact that we can sense force.
If not then are we not on the fractal ice storm's lake on ice skates?
Then are we practicing hard for what, Frostcloud Olympics as source?
Else use boolean logical analysis of national entities in united states.

What separates all from each other is space and time to move in it.
Military hardware sent to Israel used to construct hydrogen bombs.
How do I know that said bad storm to good teacup as it emptied it?
Industrial Revolutions emptied land's of people with model T bombs.

Declared war on the land to feed the starving population's appetite.
Concentration camp's now city of citizen's feeding from a pig trough.
Labeled a supermarket so now children believe food grows in petite,
Ly made artistic designer bottles synthetic paradise in boxes tough.

Ever notice occurance as smallest man cell meets woman's largest?
Never notice all of us are related birds to fish know no borders guest.

On Miracles

From few fragments of bones left fossilized we end up in this crisis.

Miracle is something did survive rib trampling of mankind historically.

Cook Pot Owl's eyes grasp of claws auction of Book Lot's predations.

Big Bang to Big Crunch nows Great Song to Great Lunch oratorically.

Suspended by a thread of ear wax hanging on doubts orbit in dialysis.



Color of body blood conventionally known in English by name of RED.

Roses red violets blue leaves green a primary color dot in television.

Predications predate motors energetic responses power of dictations.

Emergent to homeopathic properties pseudo scientific deviser division.

Deception by fact, verb, logic buying actions left all decidedly ahead?



Something is better than nothing for enterprises against impossibility.

Anecdotal accounts present every bodies witness behind closed eyes.

Into depths of motivations survival blighted revival of communications.

Famine, pestilence gluttonous infestations categorically bridges sighs.

Venetian princes Galileo ground glass to fit used organ pipes pliability.



Trade beyond pillars of Heracles Augean stables history mythological.

Past presented to future determinations comprehending completeness.

Economics social theory transactions balance book accounting nations.

Properties personality define character attitude deplete of elatedness.

Energy as massive times our constant area inverse square laws logical.

My Grandaughter

Butterfly, but ter fly, butt er fly dressed in pink.
Under soft directed light rest on to Eva's back.
Towers fowlers howlers watch for nappy stink.
Tables elements so placed composed of black.
Eva Eva on the table one day famously a blink.
...Rest of birth to work pain no time to be slack.

 Foreseer before or after momentary rafters.
Little laughter's streaming's via times corridors.
Yes, yes is yes k's of BUTTER FLY my Peom spells.

On Assumptions,

There exists a point of no known mentions. That point has behind it a room with a view. We please may call this point a or z it does not matter whether it is an absolute or a variable. It exists as a black box it works and that is all we need to know till than we face a value system breakdown.

Ego "I THINK THEREFORE I AM" or "I FEEL THEREFORE I AM" Culture's grim determin=ant.
Discovery of qualities inherent within systems measured to levels of accuracy near.
Thoughts and feelings overlap form interference patterns like that slit experim=ant.
But never exact no matter how many decimal or vulgar fractional iterations over dear.

That my point of view is not your point of view, why it is so a bubble is a sphere.
Pluto removed from plan et ary list account, mass not high so no regular ellipsoid.
Moons excluded in planetary list yet revolve around a planet yet ellipsoidal hear.
So deal is here in subject heading known as definitions predications in R2D2 droid.

ART I FACIAL IN TELL I GENT LE MAN "ROBOT"S ACT TO PROTECT THEIR PARTY OF ANDROIDS".
Right of reply granted ASIMOV grappled with IDEOLOGY of DEATH = ROBOTICS + WILLPOWER.
So what is proof of intelligence of action in YHWH's creation so to avoid evil voids?

No-thing's no energy something yes energy little willpower's Lovecraft requires a rower.

One grain of coffee anan in water sphere's hot vacuum flask hook fossil oil hour cower.
Mafioso gave godfather authoritarian power to one man's leaf blown up buy wind blower.

Reasons Sea Sons

Reasons Sea Sons

(NAME)-ism -ist and -ics = party, personalty and realty @ LAW!

Reasoning what power means to run from or fight the powerful?

Decision trees as steps made in processing information at hand.

Nand gates made of garden hoses switch on/off network nodes.

Party = THE FAMILY OF MAN = Breathing critters who own willful decisive powers.

Personalty = Possessions transportable manufactured not permanently attached.

Realty = Possessions not transportable items attached permanently to the earth.

LAW = Set of rules formed to govern conduct of members of earth's populations.

Morale = Attitude displayed by members in a discussion group in use/abuse of terms.

Moral = Fight annihilating members whom one believes abuse the terms of reference.

Name = Attributes used to identify object in the concrete, subject in the abstract.

Convention = Words used by members of set choosing to be included in discussion.

Wired = Mode as architecture, engineering by which synaptic clefts are composed.

Hard/Soft = Hardware/Software Hard determinism/Soft determinism action balance.

Qualya

"VViki said @

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falsifiability#Na.C3.AFve_falsification

Naïve falsification

Two types of statements: observational and categoric In work beginning in the 1930s, Popper gave falsifiability a renewed emphasis as a criterion of empirical statements in science. Popper noticed that two types of statements are of particular value to scientists. The first are statements of observations, such as "this is a white swan." Logicians call these statements singular existential statements, since they assert the existence of some particular thing. They are equivalent to a propositional calculus statement of the form:

There exists an x such that x is a swan, and x is white.

The second are statements that categorize all instances of something, such as "all swans are white". Logicians call these statements universal. They are usually parsed in the form:

For all x, if x is a swan, then x is white.

Scientific laws are commonly supposed to be of this type. One difficult question in the methodology of science is: How does one move from observations to laws?

How can one validly infer a universal statement from any number of existential statements?

Inductivist methodology supposed that one can somehow move from a series of singular existential statements to a universal statement. That is, that one can move from 'this is a white swan', 'that is a white swan', and so on, to a universal statement such as 'all swans are white'. This method is clearly deductively invalid, since it is always possible that there may be a non-white swan that has eluded observation (and, in fact,

 the discovery of the Australian black swan demonstrated the deductive invalidity of this particular statement

End of VViki"


Looks like we are returning to that discussion over in Hazelnut's thread entitled "Metaphysics and the principles of reality" the measurement of qualities and "QUALE" in the singular and "QUALIA" in the plural.
I will rid the discussion of such naive notions. Lets spell the "LABEL" we attach to such an "IDEA" in the "STRING" of "LETTERS" as "QUALYA". Reduce every thing down to a single word or less denotes "QUALYA". Principle qualya general. Qualya valid in that position since it is both noun and verb in it name for it's action.

IF we have four letters A B C and D.
Then we have methods of ARRANGEMENT.
RULES OF CONSTRUCTION where no two SAME letters may be in the same string.
There then are only 24 available arrangements.

1x2x3x4=24

Dennet's brain is the fish tank idea proved nothing other than that it is a good idea to make sure the tank itself has no leaks. You do not desire to drown the fish in air do you? Remote control and action at a distance are still to this day elements of mystery. Dennet never solved the problem merely identified the problem. That is good. Today we take for granted infrared remote controls. When the battery fails you do not know it has failed or the unit has failed even when you point the unit at the CCD sensor of your digital camera. The BLACK BOX of Stafford Beer cannot be denied can it? If the unit functions it is good if not it is bad. While we do not need to know how the box works when it is functioning, when it malfunctions those who have knowledge of the parts constructing the said unit and WHY each of those parts are in the place, time location in the said unit then it can be either repaired or the parts rearranged so that FAILURE is minimized. The balancing FACTOR in a circuit is LOAD and distribution of the load is a BALANCING FACTOR.

The "TERM" is neither plural nor singular since it is coined to embrace the whole as a singular entity. Such a word is required if we are to measure accurately a term/word such as "GRACE" or "DISGRACE". It is so each term that is believed to be the "LABEL" that is "TO BE" as the "CODON" in the set of words labelled "ENGLISH" as "COMMUNICATED is it not? We attach to the "PART/PARTICULAR FACT" its "HISTORY" in terms of "BENEVOLENT" or "MALEVOLENT". To own a knowledge of a "WORD" is to know the "HISTORY" of "USAGE"/"ABUSE" of each and every word or term.

My reason is simple. It is a memory. We use the term "IS" very loosely and soon end up being sucked down the vortex tube, the worm hole of "PROBABILITIES" "BELL CURVES" and "LIKE" "UNLIKE" in graduations of "MEAN" and "MEAN VARIATIONS" measuured as "STANDARD DEVIATIONS".
"DEDUCTIVE" and "INDUCTIVE" methods have serious "LIMITATIONS" in that on one hand the particulars in the case that cause the thing in question to function are hidden from view in both the micro and tele as divisions of one and multiplications of one. How mch do you remember of what you did yesterday? Not very much but the events of the day in all likelihood saw you eating during some of that time. Same for all well some then who have access to a pantry or in other words a "STORE" which in itself is a "FORM" of "MEMORY".

 "EDUCTIVE" methods do not have any such limitations. To educe "ENTAILS" the "NOTION" that all things existing are "EXISTENTIAL". Known a'priori ontologically a'posteriori teleologically considerations similar to a walk on a tight rope in the one to one macro universe with small on the left and big on the right. A view of which is "OBSCURED" by clouds of numbers to as many decimal places as there are comma's to mark the thousands. With this no entity can ever claim ownership of it is general property not ones particular property. That will make the theologians sit up and think! All action that ever occurred has a before, during and after time of event. Find an exception I can't? Am I blind or are we all blind or only some of us blind?

Not to confuse the issue but to clarify the issue as to that which is/was/will be since the qualities inherent within a "SYSTEM" are "PRESENT" and NEVER were not there. Their is nothing new under the sun is the PRIME ASSUMPTION one that can never be denied. We remain ignorant and prejudiced till we fill the following condition.

The "ASSUMPTION" is to "KNOW" the "PARTICULARS" that "FORM" the "GENERAL".