Something Good

What then is the problem with communism or capitalism or socialism or imperialism?
Do you not yet know the difference between your left and right hand as mirrors?
Of each other when pointing finger to finger the whole world is in your hands.
Same for you same for me and every one blessed with the power to give a hand.

Visual and verbal configurations words into picture of the wonderful periodic table.
The answer to life the universe and everything is 43 Doug Adams miss counted.
21 sub-atomics with their anti-particle equivalences plus the photon if I am to believe scientists.
All of it energy increased to the point of visibility via the light as measured by the rainbow.

That anthropic principle as measured by the data on the table of pencil pusher bureaucrats.
To show that it is highly likely that the evidence is true to as many decimals places as pi.
Or for that matter phi or e or any other member of that set of constants labelled irrational.
Try throwing 20 heads in a row consistently, practise makes perfect when your a juggler.

So here we deal in definitions then and members of that set who are in agreement.
That beyond the event horizon someone unknown to us must of done something good.

PURITY OF THEOLOGY SUBJECT TO CORRECTION OF ERROR

epistemology = the study of words and their origins, changes and additions to vocabularies in everyday usage. Modern day equivalents linguistics, semiology, semiotics, aetiology and information theory where all language has been reduced to strings of zero's and ones in computer operations, for it true that all computers are good at is crunching numbers fast: real fast but not quite fast enough to accurately model the entirety of heaven. The root system of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil.

metaphysics = the study of who we are, where we come from and why we are here in physical bodies moved by a will at all with spiritual attitudes to do and say and go toward anything at all like memory of past and planning for a future event. The trunk of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil.

ontology = the study of the essence of living things, which are capable of movement and operate in accord with their will to arrive, survive and flourish. Further to the point ,studies being and knowledge contained in that beings, historicity, its records as stored so as to be retrieved. Logic, grammar and oratory of each tongue, family, tribe and nation are thus understood. All material reduced down to the hydrogen molecule protium from which all other elements were formed into their respective islands of stability. The branch that twists to the inside of that left twisting tree called DNA. Information that pre-existed all that is factual in its ability to actualize a man to any and all polices that contain intents and purposes whether they worked or not.

teleology = the study of means to arrive at ends as the future directive to decisions that mark out a future life course. A word that is required since it contains in its way a forward looking angle of view as opposite to the rear view mirror angle of view held in ontological kinds of argument's that are strictly conservative and generally seek to preserve the status quo or state enterprises used to collect taxes. Asks questions like what if we did things this way not the way we by habit have become used too. All material made available as a source of supply in art and craftsmanship with tools and masters of them. The other outside string of the ongoing spiral of activity and more generally the place where discussion begins and errors are checked for in the generation of productive outcomes.

mathematics = the study of numbers and the way they are and can be arranged to provide utility of purposes. I.E. The law of large numbers means that for a throw of a dice the chance of a head or a tail is 1/2 or one in two chances. Over an infinite number of throws it is true. Tattslotto (Game of Chance in Australia) make their fortune from that deception. Each time the balls fall their is a 1/40 or 42 chances but multiplied out each person who plays, only has as much chance as the number of combinations of numbers there are in the game. You gotta be in it to win it yes but but and but you have Buckley's and none of ever winning. The number of twigs and minor branches on the two major branches.

ethics = the study of ones duties to ones fellows and strangers at that who generally speaking only serve their masters like slaves since they were not given the power to do otherwise. One army against one man is not fair. In the present hour the rule generally applied is "HE WHO HAS THE GOLD MAKES THE RULES" and the "LAW OF SILENCE" keeps Mr and Mrs General Public growing up like mushrooms in the dark. Don't open the door you will let the dark out and the light in to fog that photographic paper. No pain no gain till you get used to it. Where every problem yet to be solved exists. What those minor branches and twigs support.

Reason = The study of sophisticated arguments. Ones that on the surface appear to be true yet have some unknown flaw in their logic that is in disagreement to the law of correct demonstration. Errors take the form of FACT, ACT and REASON. Reason asks one to know how all things fit together. If only one thing then no problem if two then are they of complementary shape do they dovetail together or are they bolted, nailed or glued and which method works and lasts for the longest lifespan. The leaves of the tree and everybody in the sunlight giving the tree its power.

Philosophy = All the above in a nutshell called by me (p/q x q/p =1) which means that what is predicated in a sentence must agree with its quotient or quantity of qualities as contained in the set of words required or needed to give an accurate discription in other words the objective is to decypher the labyrinth of the inverse of a statement as an aid to the correction of an error before anything bad can occur.  One ought note that the statement can be inverted and the error detected. The bone does not eat the dog because a bone is incapable of movement without muscles and ligaments and last of all the will to move at all. Entirety of the tree is its ability to reproduce itself after its own kind. Flowers and birds and bees and all of that stuff we learned as little children and then took for granted little realising the amount of work done by past family members to establish these naming conventions.

Luv peat

P.S. One word sums all the above up into THEOLOGY, thankfully GOD the ONE who fathered THE CHRIST who was JESUS but is now, the is, as MICHAEL THE OVERARCHING ANGEL at UNITY with his father, therefore HEAVEN or the UNIVERSE owns no problems that cannot be made GOOD, eschatologically speaking, that is, the is, that is the tis in the buzzing of  busy bees in their hives, their everyday activity at home. Good it would be to arrive at that point from the present day multiplicity of extremely partial in-operative viewpoints where things barely fit together where poverty is rampant and riots on the streets ruin every day.

Bubble Burst by a Pin Prick

WuWang said on Frostcloud = Has anyone noticed that the true "present" i.e. that eternal and not temporary is the same universal creator power? Where is its creation but in the same universal mind which is finally our real being? The eternal present, the universal being, the only real existent shouldn’t be seen as at the out of ourselves; we could see it only individually reflected like on a mirror in front of us; it can only be referred to the present, the past and the future, and then its reality is only illusory as illusory are our thoughts and judgments about anything.

Are sciences, specifically physical science aware of this fact? Is it logical to apply our personal reasoning principles to those eternal of a creative supra-personal mind? Is it logical that we apply space-time relativity principles not subject to those universal? Could we really get out of the relativity of our own judgments?

The role science has played is that of its more ancient name natural philosophy.

Epistemologically is it a role that was similar to that of our ancient ancestor Adam?

Rites of naming animals to medicines role of butchering murderers cadavers Leonardo.

Those bacteria that live in all our gullet's still have a great big question mark over them.

Positive and negative feedback loops in the scientific method is where corruption is rampant.

Praise or shame that the outcomes from the experiment did or did not meet expectations.

Hypothesis is just such an event and present day economic theory is merely a hypothesis.

Everyone from the wealthiest to the poorest having to balance their books of accounting.

At least if they cannot read or write they from experience know how much is in the pantry.

Equations are more often than not balanced by their inversed square proportional analysis.

We can thank the ARABS for they were the first members of earth to realise this fact in action.

Ancient as it is, double entry book keeping records are kept so that human errors are revealed.

When a number has been transposed then the error is always divisible by number nine on the line.

That is an odd thing and nobody I know has ever been able to explain why it is we do sew and so.

peter

Get better dear forum

Because DNA is a code. All codes have authors = NO PROBLEMS: the case.

Thin edge of wedgies rogue waves in threes Edmund Fitzgerald: hi waves.

Dirac sea electrons antimatter positrons sane/insane balances: human race.

Anthropic principle fine tuning radios on list ening to white noise: big raves.

Forums and funny things happening on the way there in typing: seizure.

Kinds of characters kinds of plots kind of bounders boundaries: failures.

Moral armor mortal defense/offense threats hallow trick/treat: Caesar.

Grudges matchbox set on fire by riders pride Freudian slips ego: users.

Monetization of systems unit of measure buy bill the bill dollar: Politicians.

Man of clay case animated saliva Golem's artificial intelligence: Lawyers.

Mere words that identify attributes abstract subjects signs: Theologians.

Magic quantization qualifications lOOK wowmom bOOK one pay: Dahlias.

Three hundred and sixty four point two five days in every year: a need.

Roast on rotisserie cluck chickens crow roosters split by a spit: agreed.

 

Your dear dear doctor who?

Qualya

"VViki said @

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falsifiability#Na.C3.AFve_falsification

Naïve falsification

Two types of statements: observational and categoric In work beginning in the 1930s, Popper gave falsifiability a renewed emphasis as a criterion of empirical statements in science. Popper noticed that two types of statements are of particular value to scientists. The first are statements of observations, such as "this is a white swan." Logicians call these statements singular existential statements, since they assert the existence of some particular thing. They are equivalent to a propositional calculus statement of the form:

There exists an x such that x is a swan, and x is white.

The second are statements that categorize all instances of something, such as "all swans are white". Logicians call these statements universal. They are usually parsed in the form:

For all x, if x is a swan, then x is white.

Scientific laws are commonly supposed to be of this type. One difficult question in the methodology of science is: How does one move from observations to laws?

How can one validly infer a universal statement from any number of existential statements?

Inductivist methodology supposed that one can somehow move from a series of singular existential statements to a universal statement. That is, that one can move from 'this is a white swan', 'that is a white swan', and so on, to a universal statement such as 'all swans are white'. This method is clearly deductively invalid, since it is always possible that there may be a non-white swan that has eluded observation (and, in fact,

 the discovery of the Australian black swan demonstrated the deductive invalidity of this particular statement

End of VViki"


Looks like we are returning to that discussion over in Hazelnut's thread entitled "Metaphysics and the principles of reality" the measurement of qualities and "QUALE" in the singular and "QUALIA" in the plural.
I will rid the discussion of such naive notions. Lets spell the "LABEL" we attach to such an "IDEA" in the "STRING" of "LETTERS" as "QUALYA". Reduce every thing down to a single word or less denotes "QUALYA". Principle qualya general. Qualya valid in that position since it is both noun and verb in it name for it's action.

IF we have four letters A B C and D.
Then we have methods of ARRANGEMENT.
RULES OF CONSTRUCTION where no two SAME letters may be in the same string.
There then are only 24 available arrangements.

1x2x3x4=24

Dennet's brain is the fish tank idea proved nothing other than that it is a good idea to make sure the tank itself has no leaks. You do not desire to drown the fish in air do you? Remote control and action at a distance are still to this day elements of mystery. Dennet never solved the problem merely identified the problem. That is good. Today we take for granted infrared remote controls. When the battery fails you do not know it has failed or the unit has failed even when you point the unit at the CCD sensor of your digital camera. The BLACK BOX of Stafford Beer cannot be denied can it? If the unit functions it is good if not it is bad. While we do not need to know how the box works when it is functioning, when it malfunctions those who have knowledge of the parts constructing the said unit and WHY each of those parts are in the place, time location in the said unit then it can be either repaired or the parts rearranged so that FAILURE is minimized. The balancing FACTOR in a circuit is LOAD and distribution of the load is a BALANCING FACTOR.

The "TERM" is neither plural nor singular since it is coined to embrace the whole as a singular entity. Such a word is required if we are to measure accurately a term/word such as "GRACE" or "DISGRACE". It is so each term that is believed to be the "LABEL" that is "TO BE" as the "CODON" in the set of words labelled "ENGLISH" as "COMMUNICATED is it not? We attach to the "PART/PARTICULAR FACT" its "HISTORY" in terms of "BENEVOLENT" or "MALEVOLENT". To own a knowledge of a "WORD" is to know the "HISTORY" of "USAGE"/"ABUSE" of each and every word or term.

My reason is simple. It is a memory. We use the term "IS" very loosely and soon end up being sucked down the vortex tube, the worm hole of "PROBABILITIES" "BELL CURVES" and "LIKE" "UNLIKE" in graduations of "MEAN" and "MEAN VARIATIONS" measuured as "STANDARD DEVIATIONS".
"DEDUCTIVE" and "INDUCTIVE" methods have serious "LIMITATIONS" in that on one hand the particulars in the case that cause the thing in question to function are hidden from view in both the micro and tele as divisions of one and multiplications of one. How mch do you remember of what you did yesterday? Not very much but the events of the day in all likelihood saw you eating during some of that time. Same for all well some then who have access to a pantry or in other words a "STORE" which in itself is a "FORM" of "MEMORY".

 "EDUCTIVE" methods do not have any such limitations. To educe "ENTAILS" the "NOTION" that all things existing are "EXISTENTIAL". Known a'priori ontologically a'posteriori teleologically considerations similar to a walk on a tight rope in the one to one macro universe with small on the left and big on the right. A view of which is "OBSCURED" by clouds of numbers to as many decimal places as there are comma's to mark the thousands. With this no entity can ever claim ownership of it is general property not ones particular property. That will make the theologians sit up and think! All action that ever occurred has a before, during and after time of event. Find an exception I can't? Am I blind or are we all blind or only some of us blind?

Not to confuse the issue but to clarify the issue as to that which is/was/will be since the qualities inherent within a "SYSTEM" are "PRESENT" and NEVER were not there. Their is nothing new under the sun is the PRIME ASSUMPTION one that can never be denied. We remain ignorant and prejudiced till we fill the following condition.

The "ASSUMPTION" is to "KNOW" the "PARTICULARS" that "FORM" the "GENERAL".